Remove Algebra Remove Computer Science Remove Natural Sciences
article thumbnail

The Physicalization of Metamathematics and Its Implications for the Foundations of Mathematics

Stephen Wolfram

And if we’re going to make a “general theory of mathematics” a first step is to do something like we’d typically do in natural science, and try to “drill down” to find a uniform underlying model—or at least representation—for all of them. So how about logic, or, more specifically Boolean algebra ? and Not ) is: &#10005.

article thumbnail

The Concept of the Ruliad

Stephen Wolfram

For example, we know (as I discovered in 2000) that (( b · c ) · a ) · ( b · (( b · a ) · b )) = a is the minimal axiom system for Boolean algebra , because FindEquationalProof finds a path that proves it. And this is where our pieces of “falsifiable natural science” come in.

Physics 121
article thumbnail

Who Can Understand the Proof? A Window on Formalized Mathematics

Stephen Wolfram

And in fact, to my knowledge, my Boolean algebra axiom is actually the only truly unexpected result thats ever been found for the first time using automated theorem proving. But what about something more like a theory in natural science? But, OK, so we know its true. And thats interesting.