This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Pathway from school to materials science and engineering • Ryan suggests physics and chemistry as the subjects most relevant for MS&E. I had great arguments about mathematical proofs with my amazing grade school maths teachers and was a regular at Boston’s science museum. How did Ryan become a materials scientist and engineer?
Supports conclusions with logical arguments. Supports conclusions with logical arguments. Like Waukesha, Poynette has clear connections to literacy and mathematics, particularly seen in the elementary focus on data and supporting conclusions. Demonstrates understanding of science concepts. Grades 4-5 1. Grades 6-8 1.
The fall of 2021 involved really leaning into the new multicomputational paradigm , among other things giving a long list of where it might apply : metamathematics, chemistry, molecular biology, evolutionary biology, neuroscience, immunology, linguistics, economics, machine learning, distributed computing. Let’s talk first about chemistry.
And as a kind of graduation gift when I finished (British) elementary school in June 1972 I arranged to get those books. I’d started by considering only “elementary” cellular automata , in one dimension, with k = 2 colors, and with rules of range r = 1. There are 256 such “elementary rules”. code 10)”.
In addition to whole courses, we have “miniseries” of lectures about specific topics: And we also have courses —and books—about the Wolfram Language itself, like my Elementary Introduction to the Wolfram Language , which came out in a third edition this year (and has an associated course, online version, etc.): is PositionSmallest.
Events are like functions, whose “arguments” are incoming tokens, and whose output is one or more outgoing tokens. In physics, those “topological phenomena” presumably correspond to things like elementary particles , with all their various elaborate symmetries. Chemistry / Molecular Biology. Does this matter, though?
Events are like functions, whose “arguments” are incoming tokens, and whose output is one or more outgoing tokens. In physics, those “topological phenomena” presumably correspond to things like elementary particles , with all their various elaborate symmetries. Chemistry / Molecular Biology. Does this matter, though?
My first big success came in 1981 when I decided to try enumerating all possible rules of a certain kind (elementary cellular automata) and then ran them on a computer to see what they did: I’d assumed that with simple underlying rules, the final behavior would be correspondingly simple. Back in 1987—as part of building Version 1.0
Sometimes textbooks will gloss over everything; sometimes they’ll give some kind of “common-sense-but-outside-of-physics argument”. This argument is quite rough, but it captures the essence of what’s going on. But one never quite gets there ; it always seems to need something extra. Why does the Second Law work?
In 2015 Ed told me a nice story about his time at Caltech: In 1952–53, I was a student in Linus Pauling’s class where he lectured Freshman Chemistry at Caltech. Richard Feynman and I would get into very fierce arguments. After class, one day, I asked Pauling “What is a superconductor at the highest known temperature?”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 28,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content